Why do people disapprove of obama

Third, intelligence failed. Fourth, the threat can come from anywhere and anyone; all it takes is one depressed individual, some ideological justification or narrative, and a weapon. And finally, it is not possible to detect and deter every single danger. Train and equip programs have proven unsuccessful as military resources end up in the hands of ISIS members.

Intelligence sharing is unlikely to detect all possible threats. Disrupting ISIS operations and financing, sealing borders, and a political resolution are all important but unlikely to achieve short term changes or stop individual attacks in the US. For his critics, he confirms the impression that he will step up the mission against ISIS, nor did he make his position clear on the several legislative proposals in Congress on dealing with terrorism.

While many, especially among the republicans, want to declare a war on Islam, Obama warned against demonizing Muslims. Now at its widest since the s, the partisan gap in approval is driven by increasingly negative views of the president among the opposition party.

Average ratings of George W. This is slightly lower than it was in early , but represents a significant improvement in his ratings from late and throughout , when only about half of Hispanics approved of his job performance. Whites have consistently expressed lower approval of Obama than blacks and Hispanics, but the share saying they approve also increased this year.

Views of Michelle Obama have changed only modestly over the course of eight years, though the share who see her favorably is up 11 points from last year. While ratings of Michelle Obama are positive across all gender, race, age and educational groups, she is viewed more favorably among younger Americans, women, non-whites and those with higher levels of education.

The partisan gap in views of Michelle Obama is stark. Views of Michelle Obama are far more polarized across the course of her eight years as first lady than were views of Laura Bush when George W. Bush was in office. The partisan gap in views of Michelle Obama is on par with that of Hillary Clinton throughout her time as first lady.

In times of uncertainty, good decisions demand good data. But former President Barack Obama -- who has remained largely silent amid a rancorous Democratic primary -- came under a harsh spotlight as candidates vying for his onetime job picked apart aspects of his legacy during Wednesday night's debate. Biden faces attacks from rivals and fires back in heated debate. The skeptical examination of the party's de facto leader left several veterans of the Obama administration outraged that more attacks were trained on the former President than the current one.

And Obama has privately expressed some disapproval of what he views as unrealistic proposals from some Democratic candidates, according to a source familiar with those conversations. From health care to immigration to trade, key accomplishments of the Obama administration came under fire and faced a sometimes-unflattering re-examination by candidates eager to keep their campaigns alive by trying to prove their progressive credentials.

Their direct target wasn't Obama himself, but rather his former Vice President Joe Biden , who leads a large pack of Democrats looking to distinguish themselves in the party's crowded presidential primary fight.

Biden has tied himself closely to Obama, casually referring to his former boss as "Barack" in a bid to illustrate their closeness and benefit from his popularity. Read More. The flipside of that strategy, it turns out, is tarnishing the very record Biden hopes to ride into the White House.

Liberal candidates advocating for a government-run health care system have deemed Obama's signature law, the Affordable Care Act, as inadequate. Some of Biden's Democratic rivals attempted to hold him accountable or the high level of deportations during Obama's tenure. Even the massive trade pact his administration negotiated with Pacific Rim nations was criticized as lacking environmental and labor protections - by Biden himself. Trump, who watched the debates and is following the Democratic primary closely, gleefully took note.

A spokesman for Obama on Thursday declined to comment on the attacks, keeping with the former President's practice of not directly weighing in on the campaign and political discussions. But the blistering criticism underscores a dramatic shift underway inside the Democratic Party, which is no longer the party of Obama, despite him being out of office less than three years.

People close to Obama, who have discussed the party's changing dynamic with him, say he isn't at all bothered by the progressive shift among Democrats. And the so-called reforms he urged to satiate the public are a cynical farce. The Obama administration hasn't merely violated the law in its failure to prosecute what the president and attorney general acknowledge to be illegal torture.

It has also suppressed a still-unreleased Senate report about that torture and done nothing to prevent the next president from restarting "enhanced interrogation. Obama did not try and fail to end the drug war. He didn't even try. When the Obama administration kills innocent people in a drone strike, it does not acknowledge its mistake, apologize, or compensate the family, nor does it articulate how it will prevent such tragedies in the future.

Instead, the president just keeps quiet. He suppresses the number of innocents killed, preventing anyone outside the executive branch from judging the effectiveness or morality of drone policy. He invokes the state-secrets doctrine to keep the courts from judging whether he is violating the Constitution.

And he hides even his own team's legal reasoning. Obama took two actions that set extremely dangerous precedents: He established a secret kill list, put the name of an American citizen on that list, and ordered his execution by drone strike without charges or trial or any due process.